Research
Area
Return migration in the life
cycle of migrants
This
study focuses on the
incentives and disincentives
for migrants to return[1]
to the sending country. It
is important to understand
why people move away from
their country and what will
stimulate them to return
temporary or permanently.
The success of policies to
stimulate circular- and
return migration is
conditional on the impact of
the policy instrument on the
behaviour of migrants (and
potentially their employers).
Circular
migration is high on the
international agenda of
migration and development.[2]
This form of legal migration
is often presented as an
answer to the challenge to
create a situation in which
migration could yield a
triple-win for migrants and
sending and receiving
countries. At the same time,
circular migration seems to
address two different policy
concerns. On the one hand,
developed economies seem to
prefer to host foreign
workers as long as the
economy needs them, but
would like to avoid
permanent settling of the
migrant workers in order to
guarantee that in economic
downturns labour supply is
not further increased when
the demand for labour is
declining to avoid
repetition of failures of
past temporary migration
programs. On the other hand,
developing countries ask for
more possibilities for legal
labour migration. Developed
economies also want to
stimulate circular migration
because it is believed that
return migration may
counteract the negative
effects of brain drain for
the sending country.
Circular
migration is not new. For a
very long period (between
the late 1950s and the early
1980s) the Netherlands
assumed that the “guest
workers” would only be
temporary guests in the
economy and the society
implying a concept of
circular migration “avant la
lettre”. Overall, only a
limited number of migrant
workers returned: the
majority stayed despite
severe economic crises and a
host country that was not
really welcoming them.
When
designing a new scheme for
circular migration it is
important to understand why
people move away from their
country and what will
stimulate them to return
temporary or permanently.
The success of policies to
stimulate circular- and
return migration is
conditional on the impact of
these policies have on the
behaviour of migrants (and
potentially their
employers). This project
will look at the role of
return migration in the life
cycle of migrants and their
families. This will form the
basis for a policy study
that focuses on the
incentives and disincentives
for migrants to return to
the country of origin.
This
inspires research to
investigate under what
conditions return works.
Three issues seem to be
pivotal in this respect:
Do the
relations and the endowments
of the migrants within the
welfare pentagons[3]
of the sending and the
receiving country stimulate
or refrain migrants to
return at a certain point in
time; it might be that
modern communication- and
travel technology allows
them to keep in closer
contact with the sending
country institutions
compared to the situation in
the previous century; on the
other hand, it may be that
the investments of migrants
in financial, human and
social capital in the
receiving countries are now
becoming more important due
to the incentives provided
by the hosting country to
assimilate and integrate
more fully; if that is the
case, these investments
would tie them to the
receiving country;
1.
How does return migration
fit within the life cycle of
migrants workers and
migrants coming to developed
countries for other reasons
(family reunification,
asylum)?
2.
Under what circumstances do
returnees have a
positive/negative impact on
development? Can
reintegration schemes make a
positive contribution?
Factors like permanent or
temporary work/residence
permits and voluntary or
forced return will be taken
into account.
Given the
answers to these questions,
the policy options at
national and European level
for stimulating circular and
return migration will be
explored, discussed and
compared with (best)
practices in other
countries.
The data
collected in the data base
are organized to answer the
empirical questions
formulated above. Policy
analytical research will
complement the study on the
micro level.
Figure
1: The Welfare Pentagon

Source: de Neubourg
(2002a)